publichouse.sg

Tools
A+ R A- wide normal
Login
  • Skip to content
publichouse.sg » Home » Categories » Top Story » Community » PTOs' S$1.1b free lunch from the Gov't
  • Subscribe RSS
  • HomeOverview of publichouse.sg
  • About UsOverview of publichouse.sg
  • Categoriesoverview
    • Community
    • Focus
    • Editorial
    • Music
    • Top Story
    • Football
    • Sex Matters
    • Events
    • What Others Say
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • People
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Alternative Life Stuff
    • Finance/Business
    • Entertainment
    • Foreign Desk
  • Store 
  • contactwith us
Sunday, 26 February 2012 07:05

PTOs' S$1.1b free lunch from the Gov't

  • Written by  Andrew Loh
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print
  • E-mail
  • 4 comments
Tweet
PTOs' S$1.1b free lunch from the Gov't

Since Singapore's independence in 1965, the People's Action Party (PAP) has drummed into the heads of each citizen the mantra of "there is no free lunch". Even those at the very bottom of our society were subjected to very stringent criterias before help was doled out to them. Consider those on the Public Assistance scheme. For decades, eligibility was based on strict qualifying conditions even though these recipients were those who could not be self-reliant even if they wanted to be.

Yet, in its 2012 Budget, the government seems to have cast aside this principle of "self reliance" with regards to the public transport operators (PTOs). Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam announced that the government has allocated S$1.1b to the purchase of 800 new buses, 550 of which will be paid for by the government (that is, through public funds), with the remaining 250 paid for by the PTOs. (Read Alex Au’s write-up on this.) The S$1.1b is also to fund running costs over the next 10 years.

In other words, the PTOs - even as they continue to reap millions in revenue and profits each year - are being given a free lunch. It is as sweet a deal as anyone can expect.

This is especially puzzling given the myriad of complaints from commuters and the lack of improvements in service. It does not help either when the public learn of news that the former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of SMRT, Ms Saw Phaik Hwa, was consecutively the best-paid SMRT CEO ever for 2 years’ running, with generous bonuses dished out to her. Couple all these with the almost annual increase in fares and you can understand why the public has reacted with aghast at the government's latest announcement.

Minister of State for Finance and Transport, Mrs Josephine Teo, tried to explain the government’s position at a REACH forum on 22 February."Between funding this through a big increase in fares and the government coming in to inject into the system the resources to purchase these additional 550 buses, we thought it is a better thing to do (the latter),” she said.

It is unclear why the government feels it is better for it to inject the resources instead of the PTOs doing so themselves.

While one can argue whether it is the right thing for the government to do, perhaps there is an underlying premise to all this – that the issue of public transportation has become such a hot political potato for the PAP government that it is willing to bend over backwards to assuage public discontent. In trying to do so, however, the government could instead be subjecting itself to, in Alex’s words, a “messy affair” which raises fundamental questions of how the PTOs operate and how public funds are used.

That aside, could the PAP government also be spiraling downwards towards populist politics? It was a fear raised by Mr Philip Yeo last year, following the results of the General Election where the PAP lost a GRC and had its vote share cut by some 6 per cent. “After the last elections,” Mr Yeo said, “the ruling People’s Action Party realizes that it’s no longer infallible. My greatest fear now is that the government is terrified of the people. You cannot have a system where the people are pampered.”

Mr Yeo’s words could very well be applied to the PTOs too.

The opposition Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), in presenting its Shadow Budget this week, also cautioned the government in “yielding to populist political instincts in policy making” which it said would be a “dangerous” approach to economic management.

Are we seeing signs of a PAP government afraid that not addressing various problems swiftly will lead to further erosion of popular support for it and thus is willing to ignore principles in trying to assuage public displeasure?

On the flip side of things, however, it is good that the government is responsive to public sentiments. The danger is that in wanting to respond favorably, the government may be putting on blindfolds and ignoring the pitfalls of populism.

When it comes to the PTOs, there are many questions which the government should address before pumping in billions of dollars into infrastructure and helping operators with running costs at taxpayers’ expense.

The issue of nationalising our public transport system was raised by the Workers’ Party in its election manifesto, and also at the REACH forum in February. Mrs Teo did not dismiss the idea but said that “this would require a detailed study.” So far, however, there has been no word from the government on whether such a study is being carried out or whether one will be in the near future.

In the meantime, the government is not winning over the commuting public with such a huge injection of resources. This is especially so when the Commission of Inquiry (COI) into the breakdowns and failings of the train system late last year and early this year has not even completed and released its findings.

Hopefully, when Parliament sits to debate the Budget – from 28 February to 9 March – Members of Parliament will bring up the matter. Otherwise, the public’s faith in the management of the public transport system will take another hit – this time, thanks to the government itself.

The public, reeling from train failures and increases in fares, will feel that the PTOs are having their cake and eating it too – all free of charge, of course, courtesy of a suspiciously populist government.

 


If you like this article, please consider a small donation to keep publichouse.sg running. Our contributors and we thank you for your generosity.



Published in Community
Tagged under
  • public transport
  • smrt
  • sbstransit
  • tharman shanmugaratnam
  • budget 2012
Social sharing
  • Add to Google Buzz
  • Add to Facebook
  • Add to Delicious
  • Digg this
  • Add to Reddit
  • Add to StumbleUpon
  • Add to MySpace
  • Add to Technorati
Andrew Loh

Andrew Loh

Andrew's passion are social and political issues. His writings have been reproduced in other publications, including the Australian Housing Journal in 2010. Andrew also writes weekly for Yahoo Singapore which nominated him as one of Singapore's most influential media persons in 2011 and cited him for having "pioneered a new form of journalism in Singapore - the kind that dared to speak truth to power."

Latest from Andrew Loh

  • When activists cross the line
  • Cartoonist's arrest - not just about alleged sedition
  • A lone voice no more
  • Cheering bigotry in the House
  • Allow society to be provoked

Related items (by tag)

  • Ending the politics of dominance
  • When activists cross the line
  • Presumed guilty - "It's been decided"
  • Leave the tough talk aside
  • SMRT responsible for 'illegal' action by drivers: HOME
More in this category: « Remembering the ultimate expression of love Assault case – police conducting internal inquiry »

4 comments

  • Comment Link d Sunday, 26 February 2012 16:11 posted by d

    A WISE gahmen would have budgeted this S$1.1 billion to solve way more pressing national problems like:

    - Declining birth rate. Apportion generous funds to initiatives to encourage couples to get married. The funds can also be used to provide more incentives or measures to encourage parents to have more children. Without increasing our birth rates, we'll forever be stuck on heavy reliance of FTs.

    - Increase hospital facilities. Build more hospitals and increase bed count.

    - Remove GST on daily essentials like rice, oil, utilities, etc.

    - Fund facilities and manpower to take care of senior citizens.

    Instead, they CHOSE to allocate the S$1.1 billion to subsidise a profitable bus operator.

  • Comment Link c Sunday, 26 February 2012 15:56 posted by c

    If they did not figure out a way to use up this S$1.1 billion in taxes, they'd have to EXPLAIN to taxpayers why they have overcollected so much in taxes this year.

    If the amount was not allocated for a reasonable cause, then this $1.1 billion excess in tax will raise the question of whether GST should have been increased in the first place?

  • Comment Link Sgcynic Sunday, 26 February 2012 15:39 posted by Sgcynic

    Better to raid the reserves subsiding the PTOS than to do so giving further market subsidies to Singaporeans. Sigh.

  • Comment Link Sheng Sunday, 26 February 2012 13:42 posted by Sheng

    So is this a "loan" that is expected to be paid back, or is this sunk cost that is disguised as something else, raided from our reserves ?

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

Learn more about our commenting policy(clicking on this link will open up another window)

back to top

Recent Articles

  • Ending the politics of dominance
    Ending the politics of dominance By Tan Wah Piow In his interview with the Straits…
    2 comments Read more...
  • AGC to be joined as party in blogger’s case involving stat board
    AGC to be joined as party in blogger’s case involving stat board The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) has indicated that it has…
    Be the first to comment! Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Our Sponsors

Categories

  • Focus (14)
  • Hindsight (0)
  • Columnists (0)
  • Editorials (29)
  • Music (23)
  • Sex Matters (26)
  • Odd Man !n (6)
  • Discourse with Dr. Tilde (0)
  • Events (33)
  • Public TV (0)
  • Picture House (0)
  • What Others Say (38)
  • Top Story (16)
  • Politics (191)
  • Economy (6)
  • People (35)
  • Health (4)
  • Environment (6)
  • Alternative Life Stuff (9)
  • Community (385)
  • Finance/Business (11)
  • Entertainment (7)
  • Foreign Desk (8)
  • Subscribe RSS
publichouse.sg © 2011. All rights reserved.

  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?