publichouse.sg

Tools
A+ R A- wide normal
Login
  • Skip to content
publichouse.sg » Home » Categories » Politics » WP’s integrity vs PAP’s policies
  • Subscribe RSS
  • HomeOverview of publichouse.sg
  • About UsOverview of publichouse.sg
  • Categoriesoverview
    • Community
    • Focus
    • Editorial
    • Music
    • Top Story
    • Football
    • Sex Matters
    • Events
    • What Others Say
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • People
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Alternative Life Stuff
    • Finance/Business
    • Entertainment
    • Foreign Desk
  • Store 
  • contactwith us
Thursday, 10 May 2012 10:02

WP’s integrity vs PAP’s policies

  • Written by  Administrator
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print
  • E-mail
  • 3 comments
Tweet
WP’s integrity vs PAP’s policies

Editorial

The Hougang by-election, the first to be held in an opposition ward since Singapore’s independence, may boil down to two things: the Workers’ Party’s (WP) integrity and the People Action Party’s (PAP) national policies.

One year ago, the WP was riding high, coming off the back of a stunning and historic victory in Aljunied Group Representation Constituency (GRC), wrestling it from the PAP and in the event causing the Cabinet to lose a well-respected minister in Mr George Yeo. The WP’s gamble to have its secretary general and Member of Parliament (MP) for Hougang SMC - Mr Low Thia Khiang - lead the WP Aljunied GRC team and have Mr Yaw Shin Leong take over the SMC also paid off handsomely. Mr Yaw even surpassed Mr Low's best-ever score in the ward – 62.7% in 2006 – to garner 64.8% of the vote.

One year later, however, things are very different. Mr Yaw’s silence on his alleged extra-marital affairs earlier this year led to his dismissal from the WP which then resulted in his seat in Hougang being declared vacant from 14 February.

The WP’s action of sacking Mr Yaw has drawn mixed reactions from the public. Some applaud the WP for “doing the right thing”, and putting the interests of Singaporeans, particularly Hougang voters, above that of the party’s.

Others question the WP’s candidate selection process. They point to the fact that Mr Yaw had been in the party for more than 10 years, and the inability of the party to get Mr Yaw to account to voters – and indeed to the party itself - for his alleged affairs. Following the controversy, Mr Low, who is believed to have personally endorsed Mr Yaw’s candidacy in last year’s General Election, said that he and the party’s election committee had “absolutely no idea” about Mr Yaw’s alleged extra-marital affairs when the party fielded him in last year’s elections.

With just 3 months since Mr Yaw’s sacking from the WP, the issue may play on voters’ minds come Polling Day on 26 May.

Hougang voters will decide if the WP’s handling of the saga has been adequate, and whether the party has lived up to its General Election slogan of a “first world parliament” in the one year since the 2011 elections. They may also question if WP candidates and MPs have demonstrated the accountability which the party itself has demanded from the ruling party.

It may come down to the question of the personal integrity of WP candidates, that they conduct themselves in an appropriate manner befitting public officers and are accountable to the public when questions are raised about their conduct; and the integrity of the party itself in dealing with such matters.

Hougang voters and indeed Singaporeans in general may have mixed feelings on the issue – they may feel aggrieved that Mr Yaw had been less than forthcoming in the controversy, but at the same time they may also feel that the WP has done “the right thing” in sacking him.

Will the WP suffer a drop in vote share because of the issue? This may depend on how the PAP plays its cards in the by-election but it is doubtful that the PAP will want to try to milk the controversy in its bid to win back the opposition ward which has been in the WP fold since 1991. The WP’s brand name doesn’t seem to have been impacted significantly by the Yaw saga.

The PAP thus faces a daunting task of trying to reverse at least 15% of the vote in Hougang in order to wrestle it back from the WP. Even if the PAP sent out its big guns ministers to the ground to canvass for its likely candidate, Mr Desmond Choo, they would not carry much weight, especially in the prevailing political climate. In fact, the ministers themselves are seen as the causes of the ills which Singaporeans perceive in matters such as housing, jobs, wages, and the frequent breakdowns of the transport system.

The PAP’s battle encompasses a wider national sentiment of unhappiness with these bread and butter issues. One would think that it is no different in Hougang, and the WP can be expected to play these up to deflect attention from the Yaw saga.

For the PAP, therefore, the Hougang campaign will refocus attention on its national policies.

The party’s secretary general, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, is expected to lead the charge for the SMC, lending his weight to Mr Choo’s campaign, and address these national issues which will inevitably surface. Mr Lee’s presence will also be needed to counter Mr Low’s personal popularity in Hougang, which does not seem to have been affected much by what happened to Mr Yaw, his anointed successor in the ward.

It would thus seem that the WP will have a relatively comfortable victory in Hougang, its integrity intact.

As for the PAP, it will want to get the by-election done and over with as soon as possible, which could explain the prime minister’s earlier than expected call for the by-election.

Perhaps Singaporeans too want the same, as there are many serious issues which the country faces at the moment.

Whatever the outcome of the by-election, one thing’s for certain: Hougang voters will have a new MP come 26 May, and all sides can finally put the matter to rest.

 


If you like this article, please consider a small donation to keep publichouse.sg running. Our contributors and we thank you for your generosity.



Published in Politics
Tagged under
  • Hougang byelection
Social sharing
  • Add to Google Buzz
  • Add to Facebook
  • Add to Delicious
  • Digg this
  • Add to Reddit
  • Add to StumbleUpon
  • Add to MySpace
  • Add to Technorati
Administrator

Administrator

Latest from Administrator

  • Ending the politics of dominance
  • AGC to be joined as party in blogger’s case involving stat board
  • More than a picnic, less than a conspiracy
  • Silence over Sri Lanka’s killing fields
  • Single-identity politics

Related items (by tag)

  • She did not fight for herself
  • Judge Pillai grants protective cost order to Vellama
  • Law Society made 3 attempts to stop lawyer M Ravi
  • Court to hear case on PM's by-election powers
  • The difference between Hougang and Potong Pasir
More in this category: « Social media a function of democratic evolution: Pritam Singh Hougang by-election - a two-party contest »

3 comments

  • Comment Link TracyTan866 Friday, 11 May 2012 11:34 posted by TracyTan866

    I appeal to social activists such as Andrew Loh to be steadfast and continue to be staunchly pro Singapore and pro Singaporeans. I appeal that you continue to write and publish the truth and show what’s good for Singaporeans.

    It’s a year since GE 2011 and are Singaporeans better off now compared to 2011? NO!! The PAP promised to change and work for Singaporeans during GE 2011. But I see life getting more difficult for Singapaporeans and the PAP continue to govern like before, not listening to the cries of Singaporeans.

    I foresee the pap will use the carrot and the stick to minimise dissent. The pap will also try to use COC to gag the internet. The pap will continue to use control, misinformation and disinformation to confuse.

    The social media is a very important platform to shape opinions and educate. I appeal to loyal Singaporean bloggers to continue to speak up for Singapore and Singaporeans and not to be bought or succumb to coercion.

    All loyal Singaporeans need to fight a good fight for SG and Singaporeans and not be lured from our focus to make life better for all Singaporeans.

    I hope that Andrew and others will continue the good fight to improve the lives of Singaporeans

  • Comment Link Ron Thursday, 10 May 2012 13:16 posted by Ron

    Frankly, neither party is awe inspiring at this juncture. PAP's changes are only cosmetic. They have been skirting around the main gripes of rising costs of living and excessive influx of foreigners. In fact, these two counts worsened one year after the HE.

    WP is not faring much better. Except for some sharp questions in Parliament, they give the impression that they have over sold their koyok of First World Parliament. Accountability and transparency seem to be lacking on some occasions.

    Between the devil and the sea, I would still choose WP for a very simple reason. It's competition that made PAP less arrogant and more willing to listen to the citizens this past one year. But the road to straighten this country is still very long ahead. WP FTW!

  • Comment Link under the angsana tree Thursday, 10 May 2012 12:02 posted by under the angsana tree

    Hammer Vs Lightning, it'll be Hougang voters verdict.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

Learn more about our commenting policy(clicking on this link will open up another window)

back to top

Recent Articles

  • Ending the politics of dominance
    Ending the politics of dominance By Tan Wah Piow In his interview with the Straits…
    1 comment Read more...
  • AGC to be joined as party in blogger’s case involving stat board
    AGC to be joined as party in blogger’s case involving stat board The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) has indicated that it has…
    Be the first to comment! Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Our Sponsors

Categories

  • Focus (14)
  • Hindsight (0)
  • Columnists (0)
  • Editorials (29)
  • Music (23)
  • Sex Matters (26)
  • Odd Man !n (6)
  • Discourse with Dr. Tilde (0)
  • Events (33)
  • Public TV (0)
  • Picture House (0)
  • What Others Say (38)
  • Top Story (16)
  • Politics (191)
  • Economy (6)
  • People (35)
  • Health (4)
  • Environment (6)
  • Alternative Life Stuff (9)
  • Community (385)
  • Finance/Business (11)
  • Entertainment (7)
  • Foreign Desk (8)
  • Subscribe RSS
publichouse.sg © 2011. All rights reserved.

  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?