Complicated issues, emotive people
By Lim Jialiang
In a statement on Sunday, PM Lee ‘acknowledged that the government could have done better in presenting the Population White Paper to the public.’ [1] Rather than look at the arguments that have been presented over the course of the White Paper debate, it is rather revealing to see how the media and the State have characterised opposition to the debate. It seems that even after so many years, the PAP is still (predictably) clinging on to the idea that their policies are only lacking because they lack in style rather than in substance.
White Paper: Missing the most important questions & priorities
By Chan Chi Ling
A lot of sound and fury have surrounded the recent population white paper, and for good reasons. If all goes to plan, Singapore will have 7 million people in 2030. Between now and then, the cacophony of construction work rages on as the government rushes to reclaim new land, expand transport networks, community facilities, housing. And while the white paper speaks with characteristic optimism about the long term benefits of the plan, it has downplayed its costs and thoughtlessly put the cart before the horse by letting GDP growth dictate population policy.
A plan that missed out the most important questions
The trade-off is a real one: an aging, shrinking citizen workforce will mean slower economic growth. The question of whether we should have greater influx of immigrants to drive economic growth or opt for slower growth with less rapid increase in population is, as I have argued before, not one that can be answered by economics. It is at heart about the kind of society we want to live in, and the kind of values we subscribe to: if we do not recalibrate our consumerist aspirations, economic growth naturally takes precedence; if we really care about sustainability, livability and cohesion, it would be about children, the aged and who should be admitted and naturalized as Singaporeans.
Govt has failed Swiss standard promise; need breather
Speech by Mr Inderjit Singh, MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC
On the White Paper on Population
Madam Speaker,
Thank you for allowing me to join the debate on the White Paper on Population.
While the report has some compelling arguments for the 6.9m population figure projected, we all know it is based mainly on economic considerations. Had we focused on things like building a cohesive nation with a strong national identity, the outcome would likely be very different.
I feel the time has come for us to find a better balance between economic growth and social cohesion and yes there will have to be tradeoffs of economic growth but I would rather trade some of these for a cohesive, united nation where people feel taken care of at home and are confident of their future. I am not saying we go for low or no growth. Instead I am willing to adjust my growth expectations for a more comfortable life for all Singaporeans. I am confident we will still be able to pursue respectable economic growth when companies and Singaporeans are faced with a situation of tightened labour availability by focusing on improving ourselves through productivity and higher value capabilities. Finland and other small nations have done, we can do it too.
NSP:Population increase creates a vicious cycle
Press release from the National Solidarity Party (NSP):
The PAP Government has proposed that the population of Singapore be increased up to 6.9 million by 2030. NSP is of the opinion that this increase is likely to further depress our fertility rate, creating a vicious cycle. We propose a focus on improving our fertility rate, and limiting the number of foreign workers if we want to continue growing our economy with minimal social problems.
We invite you to our presentation.
Date: 1 February 2013, Friday
Time: 7.30 - 9.30pm
Venue: Blk. 231, Bain Street, Bras Basah Complex, Genesis Room, #04-41, Singapore 180231.
Admission: Free.
Slouching towards normalcy
Editorial
The country needs the PAP to introspect and renew itself.
While the unexpectedly comfortable win for the opposition Worker’s Party (WP) in the Punggol East by-election of 26th January has rightly been hailed as a significant political development, the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) has so far reacted to it with a conspicuous lack of introspection. Ministers and party leaders have publicly played down the loss as an outlier that does not presage a wider loss of affection for the PAP or its long-term agenda. That is disappointing, because it is likely that the fiasco came about less through the growth of the WP than by the missteps of the PAP itself.
Straits Times' appalling lack of due diligence
By Andrew Loh
Just over 3 weeks after it conducted what looked like an illegal election poll, the Straits Times has again made another blunder – but this one perhaps more significant and alarming.
On 28 January, just a day after the Workers' Party held its victory parade in Punggol East SMC, the Straits Times’ Forum page published a letter by one Paul Anthony Fernandez. In his letter, titled "Workers' Party lacks minority representation?", Mr Fernandez said that “during 10 days of campaigning, I did not see a Malay, Indian or anyone from a minority race among the WP members.” It is unclear what exactly he means by that – did he mean to say no minority race member knocked on his door or visited his home? Or that he did not see any minority race WP member walking the ground during the campaign? Or that he did not see any minority race member accompany WP’s candidate, Lee Li Lian?
Mr Fernandez then goes on to say:
“I had thought that perhaps such members could not be around due to their work commitments, but at the WP's victory parade yesterday, there was still no one from a minority race among their number.”
Time is ripe for the Workers' Party
By Elaine Ee
In the past 18 months, a wave of change has swept across the political landscape of Singapore. One general election, one presidential election and two by-elections saw the ruling People’s Action Party’s hegemony in the political sphere eroded in one under-performance for them after another. Riding the crest of this wave is The Workers’ Party, with their historic win of Aljunied GRC, then holding on firmly to Hougang and now—in another stunning win—taking Punggol East from the PAP.
The people’s loss of faith in the PAP under Lee Hsien Loong’s leadership is clear. As is their increasingly lack of fear to vote against the PAP, as the stigma of being associated with opposition disappeared with the ‘old normal’ and was replace with a new found street cred or sign of courage in the ‘new normal’.
Also clear is that people disillusioned with the PAP are pinning their hopes on the WP.
Recent Articles
Categories
- Focus (14)
- Hindsight (0)
- Columnists (0)
- Editorials (29)
- Music (23)
- Sex Matters (26)
- Odd Man !n (6)
- Discourse with Dr. Tilde (0)
- Events (33)
- Public TV (0)
- Picture House (0)
- What Others Say (38)
- Top Story (16)
- Politics (191)
- Economy (6)
- People (35)
- Health (4)
- Environment (6)
- Alternative Life Stuff (9)
- Community (385)
- Finance/Business (11)
- Entertainment (7)
- Foreign Desk (8)
