publichouse.sg

Tools
A+ R A- wide normal
Login
  • Skip to content
publichouse.sg » Home » Categories » Community » Chan Chun Sing - The price of politics
  • Subscribe RSS
  • HomeOverview of publichouse.sg
  • About UsOverview of publichouse.sg
  • Categoriesoverview
    • Community
    • Focus
    • Editorial
    • Music
    • Top Story
    • Football
    • Sex Matters
    • Events
    • What Others Say
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • People
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Alternative Life Stuff
    • Finance/Business
    • Entertainment
    • Foreign Desk
  • Store 
  • contactwith us
Monday, 04 June 2012 13:37

Chan Chun Sing - The price of politics

  • Written by  Elaine Ee
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print
  • E-mail
  • 8 comments
Tweet

By Elaine Ee / Pictures by Biddy Low

The Acting Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS), tells publichouse.sg how he views himself as a politician, how he deals with criticism, and what guides him.

It’s tough being a politician in Singapore these days. In some ways, it is even tougher being a People’s Action Party (PAP) politician. Public opinion against the PAP has grown significantly. A 50-year monopoly on power, high ministerial pay and the ruling party’s perceived privilege and elitism—combined with a widening social divide; a more vocal, demanding and questioning populace; and the open platform of the Internet—have alienated this party from many Singaporeans on the ground, as content and comments circulating freely online show. The loss of Aljunied GRC to the opposition Workers’ Party in the last General Election and the WP’s solid victory in the recent Hougang by-election, are perhaps the most prominent signs of unhappiness on the ground with the ruling party.

Yet as the people in charge of the country, PAP ministers have to find a way to stand up to all this and lead effectively.

“Do negative comments hurt me?” asks Acting MCYS Minister Chan Chun Sing, who entered politics at the last General Election. “Of course. I am human, I have emotions.”

“But comments don’t affect the decisions I make,” Mr Chan continues. “I always try to do what is right and what is good.” He accepts that some may not like him or what he does but he doesn’t “go around antagonizing people.”

Still, being in charge of a ministry which looks out for the vulnerable, the young, and the elderly is a job that easily attracts criticisms. One or two stories of neglect or insensitivities, like with the ads promoting social work which used taglines that many found patronizing, are all it takes to spark off a torrent of accusations. And these do not just affect him but also those around him, especially his family.

“The people I always try to protect from the criticisms and the personal attacks are my family,” Mr Chan, who has 3 children, says. “I shield my daughter from Facebook and even the Internet as a whole.”

Perhaps Mr Chan’s concerns stem from how some online practitioners have targeted the children of public figures in their attacks and criticisms, especially in recent times. An example is the son of 2011 presidential candidate, Dr Tony Tan, during the elections. Dr Tan’s son, Patrick Tan, was assailed by online critics for his stint during National Service and the alleged privileged treatment he received.

“My family asks me why I am going through with what I do and what I have done to deserve all this,” Mr Chan says, referring to the criticisms he has received. “My wife has said: why can’t the children just get their father back? My family doesn’t need a lot of this.”

In fact, entering politics was a difficult personal decision Mr Chan made, partly because his children are still so young. “My youngest is only four months old,” he says. “Won’t I want to spend more time with them? I have asked myself why don’t I wait till my kids are grown up, don’t need me so much and can protect themselves from all these attacks a bit better [before going into politics], and come out 10-15 years later.”

After a year in politics, he has realized that building trust with the people takes many years and that entering politics now gives him the long lead time he needs. This is also why Mr Chan feels that more people should step forward sooner rather than later. This is “so that maybe in 10-20 years’ time we have enough politicians, who are not just clever or committed—as we will always have those—but who can connect with the people because they have spent enough time with them.”

Politics did not come naturally to him. As a member of the Singapore Army for 20 years, culminating in his appointment as Chief of Army in 2010, with the rank of Major General, one senses that he is more at home in camouflage green than in all white. At least for the moment.

We ask him if he sees himself as a politician. “I have thought long and hard about this,” he replies. “It depends on how you define ‘politician.’ If you define it negatively, as it is in some countries, then we hope not to be politicians.”

He explains that if however a politician is defined as someone who is able to communicate and mobilize, which is part of leadership, then his wish is that we have more of those types of politicians, rather than politicians in the conventional sense of the word.

“These are skills that must be honed over time,” he says, referring to the 20 years it took him to earn the trust of the men and women in the army. “And I got their trust not because I was the smartest, or ran the fastest, or shot the sharpest,” the minister says. Instead, it was because he bonded with them through those 2 decades he spent with them.

In Mr Chan’s eyes, leaders are not people who just tell you nice things. “Leaders are those who are also prepared to say things that people don’t want to hear, but are able to say it in a way that people still want to listen,” he says. “The Prime Minister and I can say the same thing, and people won’t listen to me because I have not established a bond with them. People will, however, give the Prime Minister the respect because he has over 20 years of connection with the people.”

The Acting Minister admits that the long political lifespan [of the ruling party] and stable succession planning is quite unique to Singapore. “No one else is able to do this, except maybe the Chinese Communist Party,” he says. “And we are able to do this because we are a small country.”

Mr Chan describes this “unique” succession process as “unnatural.”

“In any political system by design, besides monarchies and communist systems, free and fair elections are a common mechanism to address the here and now, the emotions, rather than where we might be in the future. For most countries this works quite well. For smaller countries, like us, this is difficult though. We don’t have a hinterland; we don’t have enough ballast to run that system.”

With our political system, Mr Chan perhaps has the luxury of taking a longer-term view of having a role to play in government. And with his level of commitment and dedication to public service, it looks like he will choose to stay, taking criticisms in his stride.

------------------

Edited by Andrew Loh

With contributions by Biddy Low and Chan Ngai Meng.

In Part 2 of our interview, Mr Chan speaks of the challenges in helming the MCYS.

-----------------

Join publichouse.sg on Facebook:


If you like this article, please consider a small donation to keep publichouse.sg running. Our contributors and we thank you for your generosity.



Published in Community
Tagged under
  • Elaine Ee
  • Andrew Loh
  • biddy low
  • Chan Chun Sing
  • Chan Ngai Meng
Social sharing
  • Add to Google Buzz
  • Add to Facebook
  • Add to Delicious
  • Digg this
  • Add to Reddit
  • Add to StumbleUpon
  • Add to MySpace
  • Add to Technorati
Elaine Ee

Elaine Ee

Elaine Ee has been a writer and editor for 15 years. She has written extensively for books, magazines, websites and exhibitions on a wide range of topics: the arts, personalities, food, travel, heritage and social issues, and was formerly Managing Editor of I-S Magazine. She is also the author of five books. She currently freelances for a variety of publications, contributing regularly to cnngo.com and Time Out Singapore, and when she is not writing spends time with her four kids, practices Bikram yoga and makes it a point to keep trying something new.

Latest from Elaine Ee

  • Kampong boy, human rights champion
  • Loving our country too much?
  • Time is ripe for the Workers' Party
  • Stop asking the PAP to change
  • Building families with bricks, not straw

Related items (by tag)

  • Dancers in a prestigious local competition comment on S'pore's art scene
  • Put free preschool education on the agenda
  • Panasonic workers seek help
  • "I was born here, but so what?"
  • Chiams extend National Day greetings to Potong Pasir residents
More in this category: « The story behind the fire at Toa Payoh Why Bishan residents are upset »

8 comments

  • Comment Link Mr Freddy Friday, 08 June 2012 23:03 posted by Mr Freddy

    Looking forward to Part 2. Where is it?

  • Comment Link crescit Tuesday, 05 June 2012 22:30 posted by crescit

    calvin, my interpretation of his words is that he is of the opinion that free/fair elections better address the present needs of the people but this he feels may not be in the long term interests of the country.

    correct?

    if yes, then why does he raise this point? clearly to me a justification for 'my party knows best for sg and therefore we're not gonna let you unwashed masses or alternative parties screw things up with your present demands'.

    thus i think jack has not go the wrong impression. your explanation sheds no light - what do you mean by 'unique to us'

    are you the ex-nmp calvin cheng btw?

  • Comment Link Shi Han Tuesday, 05 June 2012 20:40 posted by Shi Han

    @ dude, based on what you brought up, the minister is right.

    That is the reason why only 40% voted for opposition. The rest of the 60% is too concerned about estate upgrading, job security etc etc - short term factors.

  • Comment Link dude Tuesday, 05 June 2012 17:39 posted by dude

    " he meant that the aim of free and fair elections were unique to us. Instead of "address[ing] the here and now" as it is for most countries, it is more important for it to determine where Singapore "might be in the future"."

    so is he is assuming that only politicians and the govt can think long-term and the electorate only and always vote on emotions and for short-term gains?? plse dont insult the intelligence of the citizens...

  • Comment Link andy yap Tuesday, 05 June 2012 00:33 posted by andy yap

    the online criticism on Tony Tan's son perceived privilege treatment during his NS was necessary information for the public to know and make judgement....as once mentioned by Minister Khaw....(not in his exact words).....once you go into politics, your personal life is public information....

  • Comment Link Rui En Monday, 04 June 2012 20:11 posted by Rui En

    Hey there! I really like this section on Public House where you interview famous people e.g. Nicole, WP's disgrace ex-MP...

    I think it's quite relevant to start from the point of how the minister handles criticism, since online comments are almost invariably against PAP. CCS came across as a personable, sensible politician for now, haha. I really look forward to the second part!

  • Comment Link Calvin Monday, 04 June 2012 19:11 posted by Calvin

    hi jack, you clearly have not understood the context of his words. he meant that the aim of free and fair elections were unique to us. Instead of "address[ing] the here and now" as it is for most countries, it is more important for it to determine where Singapore "might be in the future".

  • Comment Link Jack Monday, 04 June 2012 14:18 posted by Jack

    "... free and fair elections are a common mechanism.... For smaller countries, like us, this is difficult though."
    Is he admitting that Singapore does not have a fair political system?

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

Learn more about our commenting policy(clicking on this link will open up another window)

back to top

Recent Articles

  • Ending the politics of dominance
    Ending the politics of dominance By Tan Wah Piow In his interview with the Straits…
    2 comments Read more...
  • AGC to be joined as party in blogger’s case involving stat board
    AGC to be joined as party in blogger’s case involving stat board The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) has indicated that it has…
    Be the first to comment! Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Our Sponsors

Categories

  • Focus (14)
  • Hindsight (0)
  • Columnists (0)
  • Editorials (29)
  • Music (23)
  • Sex Matters (26)
  • Odd Man !n (6)
  • Discourse with Dr. Tilde (0)
  • Events (33)
  • Public TV (0)
  • Picture House (0)
  • What Others Say (38)
  • Top Story (16)
  • Politics (191)
  • Economy (6)
  • People (35)
  • Health (4)
  • Environment (6)
  • Alternative Life Stuff (9)
  • Community (385)
  • Finance/Business (11)
  • Entertainment (7)
  • Foreign Desk (8)
  • Subscribe RSS
publichouse.sg © 2011. All rights reserved.

  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?